<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Reasons for Internal Auditors to Get Familiar with Process Mining</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fluxicon.com/blog/2010/06/6-reasons-for-internal-auditors-to-get-familiar-with-process-mining-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fluxicon.com/blog/2010/06/6-reasons-for-internal-auditors-to-get-familiar-with-process-mining-2/</link>
	<description>Anything goes!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 07:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://fluxicon.com/blog/2010/06/6-reasons-for-internal-auditors-to-get-familiar-with-process-mining-2/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluxicon.com/blog/?p=1148#comment-284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I got two great comments offline that I would like to share with you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Comment No. 1) Auditing focuses on three aspects:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;design (&#039;soll&#039; --&gt; documents and interviews),&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;effectiveness of controls (&#039;ist&#039; --&gt; I do testaudits for those, others go into the system themselves),&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;effectiveness of controls over a certain period (like over the past 6 months).&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The latter one, over a certain period, is a great benefit for me about process mining. Another great benefit is that process mining is generic, I can use a standardized file from different kinds of systems without knowing all the IT-systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But what I can&#039;t do with process mining is to see the true effectiveness of controls, for this I use testaudits (for example, to see whether it is really impossible to go higher than the maximum that is allowed). In other words: if it didn&#039;t happen that doesn&#039;t mean that it won&#039;t happen!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Comment No. 2) Add a magic number 7: &#039;focus on the real issues&#039;. It may have some overlap with #5, but by incorporating process mining into the internal audit field I think one can really focus on what&#039;s goes wrong because in a quick way you will also see what&#039;s going right (from a risk perspective).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>

<p>I got two great comments offline that I would like to share with you.</p>

<p>Comment No. 1) Auditing focuses on three aspects:
<ul>
<li>design (&#8216;soll&#8217; &#8211;> documents and interviews),</li>
<li>effectiveness of controls (&#8216;ist&#8217; &#8211;> I do testaudits for those, others go into the system themselves),</li>
<li>effectiveness of controls over a certain period (like over the past 6 months).</li></ul></p>

<p>The latter one, over a certain period, is a great benefit for me about process mining. Another great benefit is that process mining is generic, I can use a standardized file from different kinds of systems without knowing all the IT-systems.</p>

<p>But what I can&#8217;t do with process mining is to see the true effectiveness of controls, for this I use testaudits (for example, to see whether it is really impossible to go higher than the maximum that is allowed). In other words: if it didn&#8217;t happen that doesn&#8217;t mean that it won&#8217;t happen!</p>

<p>Comment No. 2) Add a magic number 7: &#8216;focus on the real issues&#8217;. It may have some overlap with #5, but by incorporating process mining into the internal audit field I think one can really focus on what&#8217;s goes wrong because in a quick way you will also see what&#8217;s going right (from a risk perspective).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://fluxicon.com/blog/2010/06/6-reasons-for-internal-auditors-to-get-familiar-with-process-mining-2/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluxicon.com/blog/?p=1148#comment-263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Max,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment and the pointer. I agree that adaptive process management and process mining are a particularly good fit because mining less rigid, unstructured processes is just more interesting than re-discovering fixed, hard-coded workflows. It&#039;s not a trivial problem to integrate the two in practice, though. Would be a good topic for a new post.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Max,</p>

<p>Thanks for your comment and the pointer. I agree that adaptive process management and process mining are a particularly good fit because mining less rigid, unstructured processes is just more interesting than re-discovering fixed, hard-coded workflows. It&#8217;s not a trivial problem to integrate the two in practice, though. Would be a good topic for a new post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max J. Pucher</title>
		<link>http://fluxicon.com/blog/2010/06/6-reasons-for-internal-auditors-to-get-familiar-with-process-mining-2/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Max J. Pucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluxicon.com/blog/?p=1148#comment-258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Anne, I agree that processes should not just be executed but their history are essential for a business. Therefore I propose that process mining must not be an add-on, but completely integral and mainly used for process improvement. All processes with all details of execution must be archived.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I posted on process mining recently: http://isismjpucher.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/adaptive-process-theory-and-reality/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anne, I agree that processes should not just be executed but their history are essential for a business. Therefore I propose that process mining must not be an add-on, but completely integral and mainly used for process improvement. All processes with all details of execution must be archived.</p>

<p>I posted on process mining recently: <a href="http://isismjpucher.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/adaptive-process-theory-and-reality/" rel="nofollow">http://isismjpucher.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/adaptive-process-theory-and-reality/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://fluxicon.com/blog/2010/06/6-reasons-for-internal-auditors-to-get-familiar-with-process-mining-2/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluxicon.com/blog/?p=1148#comment-250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Feel free to post also other links and resources on process mining and auditing below in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel free to post also other links and resources on process mining and auditing below in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 223/223 objects using disk: basic

Served from: fluxicon.com @ 2012-05-19 02:24:01 -->
